Justice | Mercy | Faith

Justice | Mercy | Faith

God’s Goodness: From Common Grace to the Cross of Christ

Difficulty Level: Intermediate-Advanced

Jump to Answers

  1. The Bible affirms what theologians often call “common grace.” Jesus Himself said, “For He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust”, while Psalm 145 declares, “The LORD is good to all, and His tender mercies are over all His works”. Yet God’s universal goodness does not mean that He cannot withdraw His hand and bring punishment or judgment when He sees fit, does it?
  2. Why does God allow rebels to enjoy life—to laugh, experience pleasure, and receive the good things of His creation—when they can use that very life and those very gifts to oppose Him?
  3. Is there a distinction in the Old Testament between grace and mercy comparable to the distinction we commonly make in New Testament teaching? In particular, why does Psalm 136 repeatedly say, “For His mercy endures forever,” rather than speaking of grace? The Psalm portrays God actively pouring out His goodness upon His people, which in New Testament language we might readily describe as grace, rather than merely withholding deserved judgment, which is how we often define mercy.
  4. You have repeatedly expressed the thought that “the Cross proves precisely how seriously God takes sin.” But explicitly, why is the Cross the supreme expression of how seriously God regards sin?
  5. Sometimes we can miss what actually happened in Christ’s sacrifice. We repeat so often that “Jesus died for me” and “Jesus died for sinners” that familiarity can obscure the identity of the Person hanging on the tree: the only begotten Son of God. As you said, “The magnitude of the remedy tells us something about the magnitude of the problem.”
  6. Now answer this as the Word of God reveals it: Who was there on the tree?

God’s Goodness: From Common Grace to the Cross of Christ

God & His Attributes | Jesus Christ (Christology) | Salvation (Soteriology) | Sin & Human Nature

God’s goodness presents us with a profound question. If humanity has rebelled against its Creator, why does God continue to give life, sunshine, rain, food, laughter, beauty, relationships, and countless other pleasures even to those who reject Him? Jesus Himself said that the Father “makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust” (Matthew 5:45). Likewise, the psalmist declares, “The LORD is good to all, and His tender mercies are over all His works” (Psalm 145:9).

This raises further questions. If God’s goodness extends even to rebels, can He withdraw those gifts and judge? How do grace and mercy differ, particularly when the Old Testament describes God’s active generosity as “mercy” (Psalm 136)? And if God is so patient and generous toward sinners, how seriously does He actually regard sin?

Those questions eventually bring us to the Cross.

There, God’s goodness, mercy, grace, holiness, justice, and love converge in a way that common grace alone could never fully reveal. The Cross shows us both the seriousness of our condition and the extraordinary magnitude of God’s remedy. But even saying that can become familiar until we stop looking merely at what happened on the Cross and ask the far more staggering question:

Who was hanging on the tree?

The biblical answer changes the scale of everything.

The One given for sinners was not merely an innocent man or even the greatest of God’s prophets. He was the eternal Word who was with God and was God, the Creator through whom all things were made, the Lord of glory, the Father’s beloved Son, the Lamb of God, and the One in whom all things hold together (John 1:1–3; Colossians 1:15–17; 1 Corinthians 2:8).

This Q&A begins with the seemingly ordinary gifts of sunshine and rain and follows the testimony of Scripture until those gifts lead us to God’s indescribable Gift: His own Son.

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…”
— John 3:16

The Bible affirms what theologians often call “common grace.” Jesus Himself said, “For He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust”, while Psalm 145 declares, “The LORD is good to all, and His tender mercies are over all His works”. Yet God’s universal goodness does not mean that He cannot withdraw His hand and bring punishment or judgment when He sees fit, does it?

Yes. God’s goodness to all creation does not mean that He has bound Himself never to judge anyone within creation. In fact, Scripture presents both realities simultaneously: God continually gives good things even to those who oppose Him, and God remains perfectly free and righteous to restrain, withdraw, discipline, or judge according to His wisdom.

Jesus’ statement is particularly striking:

“For He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.”
— Matthew 5:45

Notice that Jesus does not say that God merely allows the sun to rise. He makes it rise. Nor does rain simply occur independently of Him. He “sends” it. The ordinary benefits of existence are continually coming from God’s hand.

Psalm 145 expands that considerably:

“The LORD is good to all,
And His tender mercies are over all His works.”
— Psalm 145:9

And yet the same Psalm ends:

“The LORD preserves all who love Him,
But all the wicked He will destroy.”
— Psalm 145:20

That is remarkable because Psalm 145 itself refuses to make God’s universal goodness and His judgment contradictory. Both belong to the same God.

🌧️ Common grace is goodness, not immunity

What theologians commonly call common grace describes God’s goodness that is not restricted to those who are saved.

A person may reject God and nevertheless wake up tomorrow morning. His heart continues beating. He enjoys food, friendship, intelligence, creativity, family, beauty, sunshine, rain, human affection, and countless other gifts.

Paul says something very similar at Lystra:

“Nevertheless He did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good, gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness.”
— Acts 14:17

That last phrase is especially beautiful. God does not merely keep rebellious humanity barely alive. He gives things capable of producing gladness.

But none of that constitutes a promise that God will indefinitely protect someone from the consequences of rebellion.

Grace is not immunity from judgment.

And that distinction becomes extremely important.

⚖️ God can withdraw something He was graciously providing

There is sometimes an unconscious assumption that once God gives something good, withdrawing it would somehow contradict His goodness.

Scripture does not reason that way.

Job understood that life and possessions were gifts rather than permanent claims upon God:

“The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away;
Blessed be the name of the LORD.”
— Job 1:21

God’s giving does not make Him indebted to the recipient.

Even more fundamentally, our very existence is continuously dependent upon Him:

“In Him we live and move and have our being.”
— Acts 17:28

So common grace is not something deposited into creation and thereafter operating independently of God. Creation remains dependent upon the Creator every moment.

That means judgment can sometimes take the form of God withdrawing restraints or benefits that He had previously been graciously maintaining.

Romans 1 gives perhaps the clearest example. Three times Paul uses the frightening expression:

“God gave them up…”
— Romans 1:24, 26, 28

God’s judgment there is not primarily described as Him introducing some entirely foreign evil. He hands people over to what they insist upon pursuing.

That reveals something sobering about common grace: sometimes we have no idea how much evil God’s hand is presently restraining.

🌿 Yet even judgment does not mean God has ceased being good

This is where the distinction becomes especially important.

If God sends drought instead of rain, judges a nation, ends a life, removes prosperity, or eventually brings final judgment, Psalm 145:9 has not suddenly become false.

“The LORD is good to all.”

His goodness describes who He is, not a guarantee that every creature will perpetually receive every expression of His generosity.

There is therefore a difference between saying:

God is good toward His creatures

and saying:

God owes His creatures uninterrupted pleasant circumstances.

Scripture affirms the first and never promises the second.

Indeed, God’s justice is itself an expression of His goodness. A God who eternally tolerated cruelty, oppression, murder, deception, and rebellion without judgment would not thereby become more good.

This is why Scripture can say:

“Oh, give thanks to the LORD, for He is good!
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:1

and then spend much of that very Psalm recounting God’s judgments upon Egypt and Israel’s enemies (Psalm 136:10–22).

The biblical writers saw no contradiction.

⏳ And there is another dimension: present goodness can postpone judgment

Romans 2 makes an extraordinary connection:

“Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?”
— Romans 2:4

This means that God’s continued goodness toward rebellious humanity is not evidence that judgment will never happen.

Sometimes it is evidence that judgment has not happened yet.

That changes how we interpret the ordinary goodness of life.

The unbeliever sees another sunrise and might conclude:

“Nothing happened. Therefore God doesn’t care.”

Paul says almost the opposite:

“Another day has been given to you. Do not mistake God’s patience for indifference.”

Peter develops precisely that thought:

“The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us…”
— 2 Peter 3:9

So the interval between sin and judgment is itself frequently occupied by mercy.

And that brings us back to something we were discussing earlier: every additional day of existence is an astonishing gift.

☀️ The same hand gives the sunshine and governs the judgment

Perhaps this is the crucial point.

We should not imagine common grace as though God established a mechanism called “grace” that obligates Him to continue dispensing benefits regardless of everything else.

There is always a Person behind the gift.

The rain belongs to Him.

The sunshine belongs to Him.

The harvest belongs to Him.

Our breath belongs to Him.

And therefore He administers His goodness according to His wisdom, righteousness, patience, and purposes.

This is exactly how Jesus speaks about His Father:

“He makes His sun rise…”

His sun.

That tiny possessive is profound.

Humanity enjoys something every morning that belongs to God.

And remarkably, He shines it upon people who may spend that very day denying that He exists.

Yet the same Jesus who spoke of the Father’s indiscriminate sunshine also spoke repeatedly and unmistakably about coming judgment (Matthew 10:28; 13:40–43; 25:31–46).

So common grace tells us something magnificent about God, but it does not tell us that judgment is impossible.

It tells us that before judgment comes, the Judge has been extraordinarily generous.

And perhaps that makes judgment more solemn rather than less. The One before whom humanity ultimately stands is not a God who never showed them goodness. Paul says that He has been giving, sustaining, restraining, feeding, gladdening, and patiently bearing with His creatures all along (Acts 14:16–17; Romans 2:4).

That makes the biblical picture quite breathtaking: God’s judgment does not cancel the truth that He is good to all, and His goodness to all does not cancel His right to judge.

Both proceed from the same holy, sovereign, and good God.

Why does God allow rebels to enjoy life—to laugh, experience pleasure, and receive the good things of His creation—when they can use that very life and those very gifts to oppose Him?

That question reaches much deeper than “Why does God let bad people prosper?” You are asking something more astonishing: Why does God continue supplying rebels with the very life, intelligence, breath, beauty, relationships, food, laughter, and strength with which they can turn around and oppose Him?

Scripture seems to answer that from several directions, and together they reveal something extraordinary about God’s character.

The first thing to notice is that God could have arranged things otherwise. The moment Adam rebelled, God could have ended the human story. The warning had been real:

“For in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”
— Genesis 2:17

Yet after the Fall, Adam still saw another sunrise. He ate food. He had children. Humanity cultivated fields, raised livestock, made music, developed tools, married, built cities, and experienced ordinary human joys (Genesis 4:17–22).

That continued life was already mercy.

🌱 God does not immediately revoke His gifts when they are abused

This may be one of the most remarkable things about God.

Human instinct often says:

“If you’re going to use what I gave you against me, I’ll take it back.”

God certainly can withdraw His gifts, as we discussed. But astonishingly, He often does not do so immediately.

Jesus describes the Father:

“He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.”
— Matthew 5:45

The evil person may stand under God’s sunshine and curse God.

And God lets the sun continue shining.

That isn’t weakness. The next verse tells us why Jesus brings this up in the first place:

“Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.”
— Matthew 5:48

Jesus is teaching us something about the Father’s love.

God’s benevolence is not merely a response to the recipient’s worthiness. It originates in God Himself.

That is why Jesus tells us to love our enemies. In doing so, we imitate something God is already doing (Matthew 5:44–45).

And suddenly common grace becomes much more personal.

God is showing kindness to His enemies.

❤️ And this is exactly what He did with us

Here the distinction between “the rebels” and “us” becomes uncomfortable.

Paul writes:

“For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.”
— Romans 5:6

Then:

“While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
— Romans 5:8

And finally:

“When we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son.”
— Romans 5:10

Enemies.

The Christian is not someone who discovered that God is generous toward rebels while standing safely outside that category.

We discovered God’s generosity because we were among them.

Before conversion, every believer lived on borrowed breath, ate God’s food, inhabited God’s world, benefited from God’s providence, and used capacities received from God while not giving Him the glory He deserved (Romans 1:21; 1 Corinthians 4:7).

And God sustained us long enough for us to hear the gospel.

That changes the emotional texture of common grace enormously.

⏳ Because God is giving space for repentance

Peter gives one of the clearest explanations for why judgment does not fall immediately:

“The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.”
— 2 Peter 3:9

And Paul says:

“The goodness of God leads you to repentance.”
— Romans 2:4

Think about what that means.

The sinner wakes up.

Breakfast tastes good.

Someone makes him laugh.

He falls in love.

He watches his children grow.

Rain falls.

Music moves him.

A beautiful evening stops him for a moment.

He experiences friendship.

And behind all those things stands a God he may not acknowledge:

“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above.”
— James 1:17

Those pleasures are not necessarily God’s endorsement of the person’s rebellion.

They can actually be God’s witnesses calling the rebel home.

Paul said precisely that at Lystra:

“He did good, gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness.”
— Acts 14:17

I find “gladness” particularly striking.

God didn’t merely allow fallen humanity enough calories to remain alive.

He allowed them gladness.

There is something profoundly generous about God in that.

🎶 Sin does not make God’s creation cease being good

There is another important dimension.

God doesn’t hate laughter because sinners laugh.

He doesn’t hate marriage because sinners marry.

He doesn’t hate food because sinners enjoy it.

He doesn’t hate music because rebels make music.

He doesn’t hate beauty because unbelievers appreciate it.

Those things arose from His own goodness.

Creation remains His:

“The earth is the LORD’s, and all its fullness,
The world and those who dwell therein.”
— Psalm 24:1

The tragedy is not that rebels enjoy good things.

The tragedy is that they often enjoy God’s gifts without enjoying God.

Romans 1 describes precisely this inversion:

“Who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”
— Romans 1:25

Food isn’t the problem.

Beauty isn’t the problem.

Sex isn’t the problem.

Achievement isn’t the problem.

Laughter isn’t the problem.

The disorder is enjoying creation while rejecting its Creator.

Augustine’s famous insight fits beautifully here: sin disorders our loves. We take something genuinely good that God made and detach it from the One from whom its goodness came.

🌧️ And therefore common grace actually reveals something about judgment

There is a sobering side to this.

If God had given humanity nothing but misery, someone might imagine the final judgment as creatures standing before a God who had never shown them kindness.

But Scripture paints almost the opposite picture.

Paul tells the pagan Athenians:

“He gives to all life, breath, and all things.”
— Acts 17:25

All.

Every breath taken in defiance of God was first given by God.

Every mind used to deny Him operates through faculties He supplied.

Every mouth that mocks Him is sustained by food He created.

Every heartbeat of the rebel continues because God has not yet withdrawn life.

This is why Romans 2:4–5 places God’s kindness and coming judgment right beside each other. The tragedy is not merely that someone sinned.

It is that someone lived surrounded by divine generosity and despised “the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering.”

✝️ But then Jesus takes this mystery astonishingly further

Common grace says:

God gives good things to His enemies.

The gospel says something almost unimaginable:

God gives Himself for His enemies.

“God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
— Romans 5:8

The sunshine of Matthew 5 is therefore not an isolated oddity in God’s character.

It points in the same direction as Calvary.

The Father who allows His enemy to enjoy today’s sunshine is the Father who gave His Son for enemies.

And the Son Himself embodied this generosity:

“Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do.”
— Luke 23:34

They were using breath received from God to mock the Son of God.

Using muscles sustained by God to crucify Him.

Using intelligence given by God to devise accusations against Him.

And He was sustaining their existence while they were killing Him.

That may be the most staggering demonstration of the question you raised.

God’s patience toward rebels isn’t because rebellion matters little to Him. The Cross proves precisely how seriously He takes sin.

Rather, His patience reveals just how astonishingly good He is.

🌅 God’s goodness is greater than mere reciprocity

We tend naturally toward reciprocal goodness:

“Be good to me, and I’ll be good to you.”

Jesus says even sinners understand that kind of love (Luke 6:32–34).

But God demonstrates something far greater:

“But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return… For He is kind to the unthankful and evil.”
— Luke 6:35

That last sentence may be one of Scripture’s clearest answers to your question:

“He is kind to the unthankful and evil.”

Why?

Because He is kind.

Not because evil deserves kindness.

Not because rebellion is insignificant.

Not because judgment will never come.

But because the behavior of His enemies does not determine God’s character.

And perhaps this brings us back beautifully to Psalm 145:

“The LORD is gracious and full of compassion,
Slow to anger and great in mercy.
The LORD is good to all,
And His tender mercies are over all His works.”
— Psalm 145:8–9

Notice the sequence:

gracious → compassionate → slow to anger → great in mercy → good to all.

And then, nevertheless:

“The LORD preserves all who love Him,
But all the wicked He will destroy.”
— Psalm 145:20

His patience has an end.

His goodness does not.

That distinction is crucial.

God can eventually withdraw the gift without ever ceasing to be the good God who gave it.

And for the believer, there is something deeply humbling here. When we wonder, “Why would God let rebels enjoy His world?”, the Cross gently turns the question around:

“Why did He let me enjoy it while I was His enemy?”

And then even further:

Why did He not merely let me enjoy His gifts, but give me His Son?

At that point common grace stops being merely a theological category. It becomes another window into the almost bewildering generosity of God. (Romans 5:6–10; 8:32)

Is there a distinction in the Old Testament between grace and mercy comparable to the distinction we commonly make in New Testament teaching? In particular, why does Psalm 136 repeatedly say, “For His mercy endures forever,” rather than speaking of grace? The Psalm portrays God actively pouring out His goodness upon His people, which in New Testament language we might readily describe as grace, rather than merely withholding deserved judgment, which is how we often define mercy.

Yes — and I think your observation about Psalm 136 exposes an important problem with the way we sometimes define these words too neatly.

We often hear:

Grace = God gives me what I do not deserve.
Mercy = God does not give me what I do deserve.

That distinction can be useful as a teaching device, but the biblical vocabulary is considerably richer and more overlapping than that formula suggests. Psalm 136 is an excellent example.

The Old Testament certainly has distinguishable concepts corresponding to grace, favor, compassion, and mercy. But Hebrew does not organize them into exactly the same conceptual boxes that we sometimes create in English Christian vocabulary.

🌿 The major Old Testament words

Several Hebrew words matter here.

חֵן (ḥēn) — favor, grace

This is probably the closest Old Testament term to what we commonly call “grace” or “favor.”

“But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.”
— Genesis 6:8

Noah found favor. The emphasis is upon God’s favorable disposition toward someone and the favor bestowed upon that person.

Moses uses the same language repeatedly:

“If I have found grace in Your sight…”
— Exodus 33:13

So grace is certainly an Old Testament reality, and the vocabulary for it is present.

Then there is:

רַחֲמִים (raḥamim) — compassion, tender mercy

This family of words has extraordinarily tender associations. It expresses deep compassion, pity, and affection.

“As a father pities his children,
So the LORD pities those who fear Him.”
— Psalm 103:13

And then we arrive at the enormously important word in Psalm 136:

חֶסֶד (ḥesed)

This is the word translated in various English Bibles as mercy, steadfast love, lovingkindness, faithful love, covenant love, and sometimes simply love.

And ḥesed is much bigger than our narrow definition of mercy as “not receiving deserved punishment.”

That is the key to Psalm 136.

❤️ “His mercy endures forever” means much more than withholding punishment

Every single verse of Psalm 136 ends with:

“For His mercy endures forever.”

The Hebrew word is ḥesed.

And look at what that ḥesed does.

God creates the heavens:

“To Him who by wisdom made the heavens,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:5

He creates the sun, moon, and stars (Psalm 136:7–9).

He delivers Israel from Egypt:

“And brought out Israel from among them,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:11

He divides the Red Sea (Psalm 136:13).

He leads His people through the wilderness (Psalm 136:16).

He gives them an inheritance (Psalm 136:21–22).

He remembers them in their lowly state (Psalm 136:23).

He rescues them from their enemies (Psalm 136:24).

And then the Psalm suddenly universalizes the whole thing:

“Who gives food to all flesh,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:25

So you’re exactly right to notice the difficulty.

If we define mercy exclusively as “God withholding the punishment we deserve,” Psalm 136 becomes very strange.

Creating the sun isn’t withholding punishment.

Giving Israel Canaan isn’t merely withholding punishment.

Feeding every creature isn’t merely withholding punishment.

Delivering Israel from slavery isn’t merely withholding punishment.

These are positive acts of divine generosity.

In our familiar theological shorthand, we might instinctively call much of this grace.

Yet the Psalmist repeatedly calls it ḥesed.

🤲 Because ḥesed describes God’s committed goodness

This is where the Hebrew concept becomes beautiful.

Ḥesed contains ideas that English struggles to capture with one word:

love, loyalty, faithfulness, kindness, mercy, covenant commitment, benevolence.

It is not merely:

“I will refrain from hurting you.”

It is much closer to:

“I have set My faithful love upon you, and therefore I will act for your good.”

That action can certainly include forgiveness and the withholding of deserved judgment.

But it can also include giving.

Protecting.

Feeding.

Delivering.

Leading.

Remembering.

Preserving.

Keeping promises.

Giving an inheritance.

That is exactly the progression of Psalm 136.

So “mercy” is not a wrong translation. It is an ancient and beautiful translation. But modern English readers may hear something narrower in the word mercy than the Hebrew reader would have heard in ḥesed.

“Steadfast love” or “faithful love” often communicates another dimension of it.

📖 And the Old Testament itself distinguishes these qualities

There is a wonderful passage where God places several of these concepts side by side rather than collapsing them into one.

When God reveals His name and character to Moses:

“The LORD, the LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abounding in goodness and truth…”
— Exodus 34:6

This passage is enormously important because several distinct Hebrew concepts appear together.

God is compassionate (raḥum).

God is gracious (ḥannun).

God abounds in ḥesed — translated here as “goodness.”

And He is faithful/true (’emet).

Then:

“keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin…”
— Exodus 34:7

So yes: the Old Testament absolutely can distinguish grace, compassion, faithful love, forgiveness, and mercy.

They are related attributes and actions of the same God, but they are not linguistically identical.

And significantly, Psalm 136 is drawing heavily upon this Old Testament revelation of God’s ḥesed.

✨ The New Testament doesn’t suddenly invent grace

This is another distinction worth making.

We shouldn’t think:

Old Testament = mercy
New Testament = grace

The New Testament vocabulary becomes extraordinarily rich around charis — grace — especially through Paul, but the reality was present throughout the Old Testament.

Paul himself explicitly reads the Old Testament that way.

Speaking about Elijah’s time, he says:

“Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace.”
— Romans 11:5

And Paul describes Abraham’s justification in terms of grace rather than wages (Romans 4:1–5, 16).

The God who saved Abraham, Moses, David, and Israel was not operating according to some pre-grace system.

Grace runs through the entire biblical story.

John makes this particularly clear when describing Christ:

“For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.”
— John 1:17

That doesn’t mean there was no grace before Jesus. John has just said:

“And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace.”
— John 1:16

Rather, in Christ grace reaches its climactic historical revelation and embodiment.

🔥 Psalm 136 actually prevents us from separating mercy and grace too sharply

And I think this gets to the heart of your observation.

Suppose Israel is standing on the far side of the Red Sea.

What has just happened?

God did not merely refrain from judging Israel.

He actively:

heard them,
remembered His covenant,
sent Moses,
defeated Pharaoh,
protected Israel,
divided the sea,
led them through it,
destroyed their oppressor,
led them through the wilderness,
and eventually gave them an inheritance.

Psalm 136 looks at all of that and says:

“For His ḥesed endures forever.”

Our categories might divide those acts:

“This part is mercy.”

“This part is grace.”

“This part is providence.”

“This part is faithfulness.”

“This part is covenant love.”

The Hebrew word almost gathers them together and says:

This is what God’s faithful, merciful, covenant-keeping love looks like when it acts.

And that is much richer.

🩸 There is even something striking about the judgments in Psalm 136

The Psalm says:

“To Him who struck Egypt in their firstborn,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:10

And:

“But overthrew Pharaoh and his army in the Red Sea,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:15

That would be extremely difficult if ḥesed simply meant “not punishing someone.”

Because punishment is happening!

The Psalmist can celebrate God’s ḥesed while God is exercising judgment.

Why?

Because the refrain concerns God’s faithful love toward His covenant people. His judgment upon their oppressors becomes the means through which His faithful commitment to Israel is manifested.

That connects beautifully with our earlier discussion: mercy and judgment are not always opposites.

Sometimes God’s judgment against what destroys His people is itself an expression of His faithful love toward them.

🌅 And verse 25 takes us right back to common grace

Then comes that fascinating final movement:

“Who gives food to all flesh,
For His mercy endures forever.”
— Psalm 136:25

Not merely Israel.

All flesh.

Animals eat because God is good.

The wicked eat because God is good.

The righteous eat because God is good.

The world continues receiving from God’s open hand.

Psalm 145 says essentially the same thing:

“The eyes of all look expectantly to You,
And You give them their food in due season.
You open Your hand
And satisfy the desire of every living thing.”
— Psalm 145:15–16

That is very close to what we were discussing about common grace.

And here I think your observation becomes especially fruitful:

What we call “common grace” can legitimately be described in Old Testament language as an expression of God’s ḥesed, goodness, compassion, and generosity.

The biblical categories overlap because they are ultimately describing different facets of the activity and character of one God.

❤️ Perhaps our little definitions are simply too small

“Grace gives what we don’t deserve; mercy withholds what we do deserve” isn’t wrong as a memory aid.

But I wouldn’t use it as a strict biblical dictionary.

Mercy can give.

Grace can forgive.

Compassion can rescue.

Love can discipline.

Faithfulness can judge.

And ḥesed can encompass an astonishing range of God’s benevolent and faithful actions.

This actually makes Psalm 136’s repetition far more powerful.

Twenty-six times the Psalmist doesn’t merely mean:

“God didn’t punish us.”

He means something much larger:

He created.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He delivered.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He led.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He conquered.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He gave an inheritance.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He remembered us when we were low.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He rescued us.

His ḥesed endures forever.

He feeds every living creature.

His ḥesed endures forever.

So perhaps “mercy” in Psalm 136 should not be reduced to God withholding His hand of judgment. It is God’s faithful goodness extending His hand to give.

And that makes the refrain considerably more expansive than our modern distinction between grace and mercy might initially suggest.

You have repeatedly expressed the thought that “the Cross proves precisely how seriously God takes sin.” But explicitly, why is the Cross the supreme expression of how seriously God regards sin?

Yes. And I think it is worth making that statement explicit, because “the Cross shows how seriously God takes sin” can become a Christian phrase we repeat without examining what it actually means.

The Cross shows the seriousness of sin because God did not save sinners by simply declaring sin inconsequential. He saved sinners by dealing with sin at immeasurable cost to Himself in the person of His Son.

Paul puts these two realities together:

“Whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness…”
— Romans 3:25

That last phrase is crucial: “to demonstrate His righteousness.”

Something about the Cross publicly demonstrates that God is righteous precisely while He is forgiving guilty people.

⚖️ The great problem: How can a righteous God justify the guilty?

Proverbs gives us a startling statement:

“He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just,
Both of them alike are an abomination to the LORD.”
— Proverbs 17:15

And then Paul announces:

“But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness.”
— Romans 4:5

At first glance, those statements almost collide.

God condemns human judges who justify the wicked, and then Paul celebrates God because He justifies the ungodly.

How can God do what He Himself condemns?

Because God does not justify the ungodly by pretending they are not guilty.

He deals with their guilt.

That is where the Cross enters.

“For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.”
— 2 Corinthians 5:21

God’s forgiveness is therefore not moral indifference.

He does not say:

“Sin doesn’t really matter. Forget about it.”

Something objectively terrible has happened between humanity and God, and reconciliation requires that it actually be dealt with.

🩸 Look at what forgiveness required

This is where the seriousness becomes almost frightening.

If sin could have been removed by human improvement, Christ would not have needed to die.

If education could solve it, Christ would not have needed to die.

If repentance by itself could erase guilt, Christ would not have needed to die.

If animal sacrifices could finally remove it, Christ would not have needed to die.

Hebrews explicitly tells us:

“For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.”
— Hebrews 10:4

And then Christ comes.

Not another animal.

Not another prophet.

Not an angel.

The Son.

“But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
— Romans 5:8

The magnitude of the remedy tells us something about the magnitude of the problem.

✝️ And Jesus Himself makes this particularly clear in Gethsemane

There is something about Gethsemane that we can easily pass over.

Jesus knows He is going to die. Yet His response is extraordinary:

“O My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me…”
— Matthew 26:39

Why such anguish?

Jesus had already told His disciples repeatedly that He would be killed and rise again (Matthew 16:21; 20:18–19). His death did not surprise Him.

And countless martyrs have subsequently faced physical death courageously.

So something more profound than mere anticipation of physical pain is happening.

Jesus calls what approaches “the cup.”

That language has an Old Testament background.

“For in the hand of the LORD there is a cup…
All the wicked of the earth
Shall drain and drink it down.”
— Psalm 75:8

Similarly:

“You have drunk at the hand of the LORD
The cup of His fury…”
— Isaiah 51:17

The cup represents divine judgment.

Christ is therefore approaching something He had never experienced throughout eternity:

He who knew no sin is going to stand in the place of sinners.

“Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us.”
— Galatians 3:13

This is why the Cross tells us something about sin that perhaps nothing else could.

😔 The Father did not spare His own Son

Paul uses astonishing language:

“He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all…”
— Romans 8:32

“Did not spare.”

Think about that.

If there were ever a person whom justice could spare because of His own innocence, it was Jesus.

Pilate repeatedly recognized His innocence (Luke 23:4, 14–15, 22).

The thief beside Him recognized it:

“This Man has done nothing wrong.”
— Luke 23:41

Peter says:

“Who committed no sin,
Nor was deceit found in His mouth.”
— 1 Peter 2:22

And the Father Himself had already declared:

“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
— Matthew 3:17

Yet when Christ willingly takes the place of sinners, the Father does not treat sin lightly because His beloved Son is carrying it.

That is extraordinarily important.

God’s love for His Son does not cause Him suddenly to say:

“Since it is You, the consequences no longer matter.”

Rather:

“He Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree.”
— 1 Peter 2:24

The judgment falls.

And therefore the Cross reveals that God’s opposition to sin is not arbitrary anger against people He dislikes.

Even when the sin is being borne by the One He loves perfectly, sin must be dealt with.

🌑 “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”

Then we reach perhaps the darkest moment:

“My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”
— Matthew 27:46; Psalm 22:1

We need to speak carefully here. The Trinity was not broken apart; the Father did not cease loving the Son, and Jesus did not cease being the eternal Son.

But something genuinely dreadful is occurring.

Christ is experiencing the judgment associated with the sinner’s position.

Isaiah had said:

“The LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all.”
— Isaiah 53:6

And:

“He was wounded for our transgressions,
He was bruised for our iniquities.”
— Isaiah 53:5

The Cross therefore reveals something that simply looking at ordinary human life might conceal.

We see someone sin today…

and then eat dinner.

Laugh.

Sleep.

Wake tomorrow.

Enjoy sunshine.

Have children.

Build a career.

Live eighty years.

And because judgment is delayed, sin can begin to look small.

That is precisely the danger we were discussing with common grace.

But then look at Calvary.

There you see what happens when sin is actually brought into judgment.

And suddenly it doesn’t look small at all.

🔥 God could delay judgment, but He could not simply call evil good

Romans 3 explains this beautifully.

Before Christ, God had:

“passed over the sins that were previously committed.”
— Romans 3:25

That could create a profound theological question.

Abraham sins, yet God blesses him.

David commits adultery and murder, repents, and hears:

“The LORD also has put away your sin; you shall not die.”
— 2 Samuel 12:13

How?

How can the righteous Judge simply “put away” David’s guilt?

The Cross is ultimately the answer.

Paul says God presented Christ:

“to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.”
— Romans 3:26

Those two words belong together:

just

and

justifier.

God doesn’t choose between justice and mercy at Calvary.

He remains just while justifying sinners.

❤️ And this is where the Cross becomes even more astonishing

We could stop at:

The Cross shows how much God hates sin.

True — but incomplete.

Because the very same Cross simultaneously shows:

how much God loves sinners.

This is the breathtaking intersection.

If God did not care about sin, there would be no Cross.

If God did not care about sinners, there would be no Cross either.

Instead:

“God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…”
— John 3:16

So at Calvary two things we might have thought impossible to reconcile stand together without either being diminished:

God will not trivialize sin.

and

God will not abandon His purpose to save sinners.

What does He do?

He bears the cost Himself.

That is what makes Christianity’s doctrine of forgiveness so profound.

God does not forgive from a safe distance.

The Son enters our humanity (John 1:14), bears our sins (1 Peter 2:24), becomes a curse for us (Galatians 3:13), tastes death (Hebrews 2:9), and gives His life as a ransom (Mark 10:45).

🥲 And perhaps this changes how we understand the “seriousness” of sin

We usually measure the seriousness of an offense by looking at the immediate consequences.

God gives us another measurement:

Look at what was required to put it right.

And what was required?

Not silver.

Not gold.

Not centuries of human penance.

Not the blood of animals.

Peter says:

“You were not redeemed with corruptible things, like silver or gold… but with the precious blood of Christ.”
— 1 Peter 1:18–19

So when I say “the Cross proves how seriously God takes sin,” I mean something very specific:

At the Cross, God refuses to save us by denying His own holiness, righteousness, or judgment against evil.

Instead, the Son willingly enters our place and bears what our reconciliation requires (Isaiah 53:4–6; Romans 3:23–26; 2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Peter 2:24).

And there is one final thought that makes this especially moving.

The Cross does not merely tell us:

“Your sin was worse than you thought.”

It simultaneously tells the believer:

“You were loved more than you thought.”

The same price reveals both.

If we look only at our ordinary circumstances, common grace can make sin seem inexpensive: I sinned, and the sun still rose.

But if we look at Calvary, we discover why the sun could continue rising over sinners at all.

God’s patience was not proof that sin cost nothing. Christ was going to bear the cost.

That makes Romans 3:25–26 extraordinarily beautiful: God had not been casually overlooking evil throughout history. The Cross would publicly demonstrate that His mercy had never required Him to cease being righteous.

Calvary vindicates both the seriousness of God’s holiness and the astonishing extravagance of His mercy.

Sometimes we can miss what actually happened in Christ’s sacrifice. We repeat so often that “Jesus died for me” and “Jesus died for sinners” that familiarity can obscure the identity of the Person hanging on the tree: the only begotten Son of God. As you said, “The magnitude of the remedy tells us something about the magnitude of the problem.”

Yes. And I think that is precisely where familiarity with the language of the Cross can unintentionally dull its force. We hear “Jesus died for our sins” so often that the sentence can become almost compact and manageable. But if we slow it down and ask Who is this Jesus who died?, the event becomes almost unbearable in its magnitude.

The Cross is not astonishing merely because someone died for sinners. It is astonishing because of who that Someone is.

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…”
— John 3:16

The value of the gift cannot be separated from the identity of the One given.

✝️ Who exactly is hanging there?

John has already told us before we ever arrive at Calvary:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
— John 1:1

And:

“All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.”
— John 1:3

Then Paul says of Christ:

“For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth…”
— Colossians 1:16

Now put those statements beside the crucifixion.

The One hanging upon the wood is the One through whom the tree came into existence.

The iron in the nails exists because He created the elements from which it came.

The soldiers driving those nails breathe because He sustains them.

The earth beneath the Cross exists through Him.

The sun that darkens was made through Him.

The human nervous system experiencing the agony was designed by Him — and He has truly assumed human nature and entered into that suffering.

Hebrews says:

“Upholding all things by the word of His power…”
— Hebrews 1:3

That means the One being crucified is not merely inside creation suffering at the hands of creation.

He is simultaneously the One through whom creation continues to exist.

There is something almost impossible for the mind to hold together there.

🌳 The Creator permits His creatures to crucify Him

John tells us:

“He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.”
— John 1:10

That verse becomes terrifyingly concrete at Calvary.

The world made through Him does not recognize Him.

And then the next verse:

“He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him.”
— John 1:11

Eventually, “did not receive Him” becomes:

“Crucify Him, crucify Him!”
— Luke 23:21

Yet Jesus had already made clear that this was not happening because He had become powerless:

“No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself.”
— John 10:18

And when Peter attempts to defend Him:

“Do you think that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He will provide Me with more than twelve legions of angels?”
— Matthew 26:53

So we must never imagine the Cross as the moment when Jesus unfortunately falls into the hands of stronger men.

There are no stronger men.

He gives Himself.

“Christ… has given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God.”
— Ephesians 5:2

That changes everything.

❤️ And He is not merely “Jesus.” He is the Father’s beloved Son

This is the dimension you are emphasizing, and it matters enormously.

Before Jesus begins His public ministry, the Father declares:

“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
— Matthew 3:17

At the Transfiguration:

“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!”
— Matthew 17:5

The sacrifice is therefore not the offering of something disposable to God.

It is not God giving something He can easily replace.

It is the Son.

Abraham and Isaac give us a haunting shadow of this:

“Take now your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love…”
— Genesis 22:2

Notice how the language deliberately presses upon the preciousness of the sacrifice:

your son
your only son
whom you love.

But Abraham is stopped.

“Do not lay your hand on the lad…”
— Genesis 22:12

A substitute is provided:

“Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up for a burnt offering instead of his son.”
— Genesis 22:13

Isaac comes down from the mountain.

Centuries later, another beloved Son goes up a mountain.

And this time there is no voice saying, “Do not lay your hand on Him.”

Paul’s language becomes almost overwhelming:

“He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all…”
— Romans 8:32

His own Son.

That is not incidental wording.

🩸 This is why the magnitude of the remedy is so revealing

Suppose we ask:

“How serious is human sin?”

We might look at ourselves and answer incorrectly.

We still laugh.

We still eat.

The world remains beautiful.

People commit terrible sins and sometimes live long, prosperous lives.

The sun continues rising over the evil and the good, as we have been discussing (Matthew 5:45).

From common grace alone, someone could badly underestimate what sin means before God.

So God gives us another place from which to measure it.

Calvary.

What does reconciliation between sinful humanity and the holy God ultimately require?

Look at the tree.

The answer hanging there is:

the incarnate Son of God.

“In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins.”
— Colossians 1:14

And immediately afterward Paul tells us who this Person is:

“He is the image of the invisible God…”
— Colossians 1:15

Then:

“By Him all things were created…”
— Colossians 1:16

And:

“In Him all things consist.”
— Colossians 1:17

Paul almost seems unwilling to let us say “His blood” without understanding whose blood we are talking about.

That is breathtaking.

😮 And Acts uses even more startling language

Paul tells the Ephesian elders:

“Shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.”
— Acts 20:28

Whatever textual and grammatical nuances we discuss around that verse, the New Testament’s larger affirmation is unmistakable: the blood shed at Calvary belongs to the incarnate divine Son.

Not because the divine nature can bleed or die, but because the Person who truly bleeds and dies according to His humanity is the eternal Son of God.

This is why the early Church guarded the identity of Christ so fiercely.

If Jesus is merely an extraordinarily righteous man, Calvary changes completely.

But if:

“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us…”
— John 1:14

then the Cross is something creation had never witnessed before.

🌌 Perhaps “Jesus died for me” needs both halves

There is nothing wrong with saying:

“Jesus died for me.”

Paul himself makes it wonderfully personal:

“The Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.”
— Galatians 2:20

We should never lose that “me.”

But perhaps the danger comes when we emphasize the me so much that we cease being astonished by the Son of God.

Paul holds both together:

“the Son of God”
“loved me”
“gave Himself”
“for me.”

The wonder of the sentence depends upon knowing who stands on both sides of it.

Who am I?

A sinner needing reconciliation.

Who is He?

The Son of God.

Then the distance between those two makes “gave Himself for me” almost incomprehensible.

🥲 And this says something enormous about God’s valuation of us too

There is another side we shouldn’t miss.

The magnitude of the remedy tells us something about the magnitude of the problem.

Absolutely.

But the magnitude of the remedy also tells us something about the magnitude of God’s love.

John does not say merely that God loved.

He points to the gift as the demonstration:

“In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world…”
— 1 John 4:9

And then:

“In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son…”
— 1 John 4:10

So the Cross simultaneously says two things that almost overwhelm each other:

Sin is so serious that nothing less than this could accomplish our redemption.

And:

God loves sinners so greatly that He gave this.

Not an angel.

Not merely a prophet.

Not another creature.

His Son.

And Hebrews pushes it even further:

“How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation…”
— Hebrews 2:3

“So great.”

Yes.

Because salvation’s greatness cannot finally be measured merely by what we were rescued from.

It must also be measured by Who came to rescue us.

And perhaps that is where our familiarity needs occasional interruption. We can become so accustomed to looking at the Cross that we immediately see a theological symbol: atonement, forgiveness, salvation, justification.

All true.

But before all our theological categories, there is a Person hanging there.

The beloved Son.

The eternal Word.

The image of the invisible God.

The One through whom all things were created.

The One in whom all things hold together.

And He is there voluntarily.

For us.

That makes Paul’s question almost inevitable:

“He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?”
— Romans 8:32

Once God has given the Son, Paul almost seems to say, what greater gift could possibly remain?

The Cross is therefore not merely the place where we learn how bad sin is.

It is the place where we discover simultaneously how holy God is, how terrible sin is, how immeasurably precious Christ is, and how astonishingly far God’s love was willing to go to bring sinners home.

And the center of all of it is not merely the wood, the nails, the blood, or even the suffering.

It is Who was on the tree.

Now answer this as the Word of God reveals it: Who was there on the tree?

The Word of God does not permit us to look at the tree and see merely a martyr, a prophet, an innocent man, or even simply “our Savior.” It keeps pulling back the veil and telling us Who is there.

And the more Scripture answers the question, the more astonishing Calvary becomes.

✝️ Who was there on the tree?

The Word who was with God and was God.

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
— John 1:1

The One hanging there did not begin in Bethlehem.

Before Abraham:

“Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
— John 8:58

Before creation, He was.

And that eternal Word:

“became flesh and dwelt among us.”
— John 1:14

The One on the Cross is God the Son truly become man.

Not God pretending to be human.

Not a human being temporarily inhabited by God.

The eternal Son has taken our humanity to Himself.

And now He can bleed.

He can thirst.

He can suffer.

He can die.

🌌 The Creator was there

John says:

“All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.”
— John 1:3

Paul says:

“By Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible…”
— Colossians 1:16

The Man whose hands were nailed to wood made the hands that nailed Him there.

The One being lifted above the earth:

“is before all things, and in Him all things consist.”
— Colossians 1:17

Hebrews says He is:

“upholding all things by the word of His power.”
— Hebrews 1:3

This is almost beyond our capacity to contemplate.

The creation was not sustaining the crucified Christ.
The crucified Christ was sustaining the creation.

Even there.

👑 The Lord of glory was there

Paul uses an extraordinary title:

“Had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.”
— 1 Corinthians 2:8

The Lord of glory.

The glory Isaiah saw:

“I saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lifted up…”
— Isaiah 6:1

John later tells us, speaking in the context of Isaiah’s vision:

“These things Isaiah said when he saw His glory and spoke of Him.”
— John 12:41

The One before whom seraphim cover their faces crying:

“Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts;
The whole earth is full of His glory!”
— Isaiah 6:3

is the One before whom men now wag their heads and mock:

“He saved others; Himself He cannot save.”
— Matthew 27:42

What a reversal.

Heaven covers its face before His holiness.

Earth spits in His face.

And He permits it.

❤️ The Father’s beloved Son was there

At His baptism the heavens opened:

“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
— Matthew 3:17

At the Transfiguration the Father says it again:

“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!”
— Matthew 17:5

This is the Son who prayed:

“Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”
— John 17:5

Before there was an Adam.

Before there were angels.

Before there were stars.

Before there was anything created at all:

the Father loved the Son.

Jesus says:

“You loved Me before the foundation of the world.”
— John 17:24

And that Son is on the tree.

Now Romans 8:32 becomes almost painful to read slowly:

“He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all…”

His own Son.

🕊️ The sinless One was there

Pilate could find no fault in Him (John 19:4).

Peter says:

“Who committed no sin,
Nor was deceit found in His mouth.”
— 1 Peter 2:22

Paul says He:

“knew no sin.”
— 2 Corinthians 5:21

Hebrews says He was:

“holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners.”
— Hebrews 7:26

There was nothing in Him deserving that tree.

Nothing.

No secret corruption.

No hidden selfishness.

No moment of rebellion against His Father.

No sinful thought requiring forgiveness.

No stain.

The only truly innocent Man who ever lived is dying the death of the guilty.

🐑 The Lamb of God was there

John the Baptist had announced Him:

“Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!”
— John 1:29

For centuries blood had flowed from Israel’s altars.

Lamb after lamb.

Sacrifice after sacrifice.

Passover after Passover.

But Hebrews tells us:

“It is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.”
— Hebrews 10:4

They were pointing beyond themselves.

Then finally the Lamb arrives.

Peter says we were redeemed:

“with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.”
— 1 Peter 1:19

Isaiah had seen Him centuries before:

“He was led as a lamb to the slaughter.”
— Isaiah 53:7

The sacrifices were shadows.

The One on the tree is the reality.

⚖️ Our Substitute was there

And now we come to why He is there.

Isaiah does something extraordinary with the pronouns:

He was wounded for our transgressions,
He was bruised for our iniquities;
The chastisement for our peace was upon Him,
And by His stripes we are healed.”
— Isaiah 53:5

He.

Our.

Him.

We.

Again:

“The LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all.”
— Isaiah 53:6

Peter echoes Isaiah:

“Who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree.”
— 1 Peter 2:24

Paul says:

“Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us.”
— Galatians 3:13

The One who has no sin is carrying ours.

The Blessed One bears the curse.

The Righteous One stands where the unrighteous should stand.

🤲 God was reconciling us to Himself there

Paul gives us perhaps one of the deepest statements about what is happening:

“God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them.”
— 2 Corinthians 5:19

This protects us from imagining Calvary as though a loving Jesus were rescuing us from an unwilling or hostile Father.

No.

The Father sent the Son (John 3:16).

The Son willingly gave Himself (Galatians 2:20).

The Spirit is involved in His offering:

“Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God…”
— Hebrews 9:14

The Triune God is accomplishing our salvation.

The Father is not the Son, and the Son is the Person incarnate and crucified. Yet the Cross reveals the saving purpose of God Himself.

👑 Israel’s King was there

Pilate unknowingly placed a profound truth above His head:

“JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”
— John 19:19

He looks nothing like the world’s idea of a king.

No throne.

No visible army.

No crown of gold.

Only thorns.

Yet Jesus had already said:

“My kingdom is not of this world.”
— John 18:36

The King is conquering precisely where everyone thinks He is being defeated.

Paul later says:

“Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it.”
— Colossians 2:15

The apparent victim is the Victor.

🌎 The second Man, the last Adam, was there

There is another enormous dimension.

The first Adam stood in a garden surrounded by God’s abundance and disobeyed.

The last Adam enters suffering and says:

“Not My will, but Yours, be done.”
— Luke 22:42

Paul says:

“For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.”
— Romans 5:19

Adam reached toward a tree in disobedience.

Christ goes willingly to a tree in obedience.

“He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross.”
— Philippians 2:8

Humanity finally has before God the obedient Man.

Where Adam failed, Christ obeyed.

Where Israel failed, Christ obeyed.

Where we failed, Christ obeyed.

Even unto death.

❤️ Our Shepherd was there

Jesus had said:

“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep.”
— John 10:11

Then:

“I lay down My life for the sheep.”
— John 10:15

The Shepherd is not watching the wolves devour the sheep from a safe distance.

He puts Himself between death and His sheep.

And Isaiah’s wandering sheep:

“All we like sheep have gone astray…”
— Isaiah 53:6

are brought home because the Shepherd Himself bears their iniquity.

🩸 Our Redeemer was there

Peter says:

“You were not redeemed with corruptible things, like silver or gold… but with the precious blood of Christ.”
— 1 Peter 1:18–19

The price of our redemption tells us something about the One who considered us worth redeeming according to His love and purpose.

And here we need to stop reducing Calvary merely to the physical instrument of execution.

Wood was there.

Nails were there.

Blood was there.

Soldiers were there.

Two criminals were there.

A crowd was there.

But Scripture keeps directing our eyes toward the Person.

🌑 The One who could have come down stayed there

This may be one of the most astonishing things of all.

They mocked Him:

“If You are the Son of God, come down from the cross.”
— Matthew 27:40

The irony is almost unbearable.

He could.

That was never the question.

Earlier He had said:

“Do you think that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He will provide Me with more than twelve legions of angels?”
— Matthew 26:53

The nails were not ultimately keeping Him there.

Rome was not keeping Him there.

The Jewish leaders were not keeping Him there.

Human weakness was not keeping Him there.

Jesus had already explained:

“No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself.”
— John 10:18

So why does He stay?

Paul answers personally:

“The Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.”
— Galatians 2:20

Love kept Him moving willingly through the Father’s saving purpose to its completion.

🌅 And who came out of the tomb?

The same Person.

The Lamb who was slain lives.

Thomas sees Him and says:

“My Lord and my God!”
— John 20:28

And Jesus receives it.

Then Revelation allows us to see where the crucified One is now:

“I saw a Lamb standing, as though it had been slain…”
— Revelation 5:6

And heaven sings:

“Worthy is the Lamb who was slain
To receive power and riches and wisdom,
And strength and honor and glory and blessing!”
— Revelation 5:12

That is Who was on the tree.

The eternal Word.
The Creator of all things.
The image of the invisible God.
The Lord of glory.
The Father’s beloved Son.
The Holy and Righteous One.
The Lamb of God.
Israel’s Messiah and King.
The last Adam.
The Good Shepherd.
Our Substitute.
Our Redeemer.
Our Lord.

Jesus Christ.

And perhaps after Scripture has said all of that, John 3:16 sounds different:

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…”

We can become accustomed to the word “gave.”

But once we understand Who was given, the word becomes enormous.

And then perhaps we understand why Paul, after contemplating Christ, simply erupts:

“Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!”
— 2 Corinthians 9:15

The Gift was not merely salvation.

At the heart of salvation, God gave us His Son.