This is a very thoughtful and important question. When encountering an ambiguous or disputed passage like Exodus 17:16, where the Hebrew can be interpreted in multiple valid ways (e.g., kēs for “throne” vs. nēs for “banner”), the approach of a believer should be guided by both humility and wisdom.
Here’s a framework for navigating such moments:
🧭 1. Acknowledge the Ambiguity Honestly
The fact that the Hebrew is unusual (e.g., kēs missing the final aleph in “kisse” for throne) isn’t a flaw—it’s part of the richness of the biblical text. God’s Word often leaves room for meditation rather than mere information.
“It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of kings is to search it out.” (Proverbs 25:2)
You’re not being unfaithful if you acknowledge that a text can support multiple readings.
🕊 2. Ask: What Do All Interpretations Teach About God?
Instead of picking one “winner,” ask what each interpretation might reveal about God or His relationship with His people:
- Throne = vow/oath: Suggests God’s solemn commitment to oppose evil.
- Throne = Moses reaching toward God: Emphasizes the divine-human cooperation in intercession.
- Enemies’ hand against the throne: Portrays spiritual rebellion and the reality of opposition to God’s kingdom.
- Banner (nēs): Connects to God’s protection, guidance, and His identity being lifted up (cf. Isaiah 11:10, “a banner for the peoples”).
Each interpretation leads to a theologically consistent idea in line with Scripture. None contradicts the core message.
🔍 3. Let Scripture Interpret Scripture
Look at how later writers understood the event. For example, in Deuteronomy 25:17–19, Amalek is again condemned for attacking the weak. And in 1 Samuel 15, Saul is judged for not completing God’s command regarding Amalek. These reinforce God’s justice, memory, and faithfulness, regardless of which image (throne or banner) one prefers.
🧠 4. Engage With the Tradition Without Being Dogmatic
Biblical scholars, rabbis, and church fathers wrestled with these very ambiguities. Their discussions are not a failure of interpretation—they are a testimony to the depth of the text.
You don’t need to be afraid of having a preferred interpretation, especially if it resonates with the broader message of Scripture. But also, leave room for mystery and others’ insights.
✝️ 5. See How Christ Fulfills the Symbolism
In Christ, the idea of throne, banner, and intercession come together:
- He is the King on the throne.
- He is the banner lifted up (John 3:14; Isaiah 11:10).
- He is the intercessor who stretches out His hands (Hebrews 7:25).
So even in textual ambiguity, we see clarity in the person of Jesus.
💡 Final Thought
Was something “lost” here? Perhaps the original nuance, yes. But was the truth lost? No. God’s Word is living, and even when textual details are debated, the core revelation is preserved.
A faithful approach is not to be paralyzed by ambiguity, but to worship through it, trust the Spirit’s guidance, and stay open to layers of meaning that all point back to God’s justice, mercy, and victory.
Would you like to look at how ancient translations like the Septuagint or the Targums handled this verse? That could add another layer to the discussion.